From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.


Cross-motions by the parties for summary judgment in an action by a subcontractor to recover on a bond under the provisions of title 40, section 270, United States Code, commonly known as the "Heard Law." Order dismissing the complaint and granting summary judgment for the defendant affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The remedy given to plaintiff by the statute must be strictly followed through an action in the Federal court in the district where the contract was performed. This prescribed remedy was not followed by the plaintiff. The courts of this State have no jurisdiction of this action. ( People v. Metropolitan Surety Co., 211 N.Y. 107.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Company

Case Details

Full title:GIACOMO ALLEVA, Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

United States v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

There was no such waiver here. State courts have consistently refused to entertain suits against sureties who…