From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 1, 1990
561 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 87-03464.

June 1, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County, E. Randolph Bentley, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Donald Allen challenges the trial court's order sentencing him to three consecutive life sentences. We vacate the sentence and remand the case.

Allen was charged and convicted of armed robbery with a firearm, Counts I and II; aggravated assault, Count III; armed burglary, Count IV; kidnapping, Counts V, VI and VII; sexual battery, Counts VIII and IX; and impersonating an officer, Count X. The recommended sentence under the sentencing guidelines scoresheet is life imprisonment. The trial court sentenced Allen to three consecutive life sentences. This constitutes an upward departure from the guidelines, requiring written reasons. Robinson v. State, 520 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1988); Daughtry v. State, 521 So.2d 208 (Fla.App. 2 Dist.), review denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 1988).

Because no written reasons for the upward departure were given by the trial court, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for the trial court to sentence Allen within the recommended guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990).

Accordingly, we vacate Allen's sentence and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.

HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 1, 1990
561 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 1, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Tutt v. State

We find that the imposition of consecutive life sentences represents a departure from the guideline…

Reed v. State

The state contends that application of the Pope rule would be improper before a decision is made on the…