Opinion
05-23-00596-CV
08-30-2023
On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17509
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Goldstein
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal because there did not appear to be a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (generally appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and certain interlocutory orders as permitted by statute); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (listing appealable interlocutory orders). A final judgment is one that disposes of all parties and claims. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the jurisdictional issue.
Appellant appeals from the trial court's June 2, 2023 order granting summary judgment for some but not all of the defendants. Appellant's claims against the non-moving defendants remain pending. In his jurisdictional brief, appellant appears to acknowledge the order is not appealable by stating that he filed the notice of appeal "reserving his rights to appeal the Judge's decision at the appropriate time." Accordingly, on the record before us, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
JUDGMENT
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered August 30, 2023