Allen v. Olin Corporation

Full title: KEVEN ALLEN AND MARILYN ALLEN, Plaintiffs, v. OLIN CORPORATION, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Oct 5, 2005

Case No. C 03-01646 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 03-01646 RMW.

October 5, 2005

RICHARD ALEXANDER, JEFFREY W/RICKARD, RYAN M. HAGAN, ALEXANDER, HAWES AUDET, LLP, San Jose, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff(s).

RANDALL C. CREECH, CREECH, LIEBOW KRAUS, San Jose, CA, THOMAS M. CARNEY, admitted pro hac vice, CAROL A. RUTTER, admitted pro hac vice, HUSCH EPPENBERGER, LLC, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Defendant Olin Corporation.

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT OLIN CORPORATION BY PLAINTIFFS KEVEN ALLEN AND MARILYN ALLEN

RONALD WHYTE, District Judge

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiffs Keven Allen and Marilyn Allen and Defendant Olin Corporation hereby request that this Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), enter an Order dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiffs Keven Allen and Marilyn Allen as to defendant Olin Corporation. All parties to bear their own costs and legal fees incurred to date in this action.

ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE DEFENDANT OLIN CORPORATION BY PLAINTIFFS KEVEN ALLEN AND MARILYN ALLEN

THIS MATTER coming on the motion of Plaintiffs Keven Allen and Marilyn Allen and Defendant Olin Corporation, for an order of dismissal with prejudice against the defendant OLIN CORPORATION, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2):

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.

Plaintiffs Keven Allen and Marilyn Allen's claims against Defendant Olin Corporation are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(2). Each party shall bear their own costs and legal fees incurred to date in this action.

SO ORDERED.