Allen v. Ohio Department of Job Family Services

Full title: Terina Allen, Plaintiff, v. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, et…

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 10, 2006

Case No. C-2-05-0707 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. C-2-05-0707.

August 10, 2006

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE SMITH, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Ohio Department of Job Family Services and Thomas Hutter's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (Doc. 7). For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

Defendants argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Title VII claim against Defendant Hutter and her state law claims against ODJFS and Hutter and therefore they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). Plaintiff has filed a response to Defendants' Motion, but does not oppose it. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is therefore GRANTED. Defendants are entitled to judgment on all claims asserted against Defendant Hutter and the state law claims asserted against ODJFS.

Therefore, the remaining claims in this case are the Title VII claims against ODJFS set forth in the Complaint as Counts I, II, and V.

The Clerk shall remove Doc. 7 from the Court's pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.