From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Ghoulish Gallery

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Jul 17, 2007
Civil 06cv371 NLS (S.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2007)

Opinion


EDWARD ALLEN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE GHOULISH GALLERY, an entity of unknown form; TIM TURNER, an individual, APRIL TURNER, an individual, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. And Related Counterclaim. Civil No. 06cv371 NLS United States District Court, S.D. California. July 17, 2007

          ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT NO. 71 FROM THE RECORD [Doc. No. 71]

          NITA L. STORMES, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion to continue pretrial dates, but did not sign the application. [Doc. No. 71.] Plaintiff then re-submitted the ex parte application and included his electronic signature. [Doc. No. 72.] Because the filings are duplicative, and the first filing lacks Plaintiff's signature, the Court ORDERS that Document No. 71 be STRICKEN from the record.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. Ghoulish Gallery

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Jul 17, 2007
Civil 06cv371 NLS (S.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Allen v. Ghoulish Gallery

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD ALLEN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE GHOULISH GALLERY, an entity…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Jul 17, 2007

Citations

Civil 06cv371 NLS (S.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2007)