Opinion
Case No. 05-C-975.
January 12, 2006.
OPINION AND ORDER
The Defendants in this case have moved for summary judgment and have also asked this court to stay discovery until the summary judgment motions are resolved. The Plaintiff opposes the motions to stay because, among other reasons, he might need the discovery in connection with the summary judgment motions. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). Therefore, because discovery might be necesary, the court ORDERS that the "Motion to Stay Discovery" (filed December 15, 2005 by Defendants Kliewer and Kelcz) IS DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the "Motion to Stay Discovery" (filed January 10, 2006 by Defendant Shannahan) IS DENIED.
Done and Ordered.