From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. City of Antioch

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 30, 2024
23-cv-01895-VC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-01895-VC

04-30-2024

TRENT ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS RE: DKT. NO. 81

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The motion to dismiss the claims against Deven Wenger is granted. This ruling assumes the reader is familiar with the facts, the applicable legal standards, and the arguments made by both parties.

The nonconclusory allegations in the complaint about Wenger are insufficient to state a claim against him. The complaint alleges only that Wenger received hateful text messages, that he received messages in which other officers bragged about violating civil rights, and that he did not generally intervene in or report the text messages or his awareness of the conduct described in them. The opposition brief mostly does not defend the complaint but instead rests on additional allegations, apparently supported by the recently-unsealed indictment of Wenger.

A complaint including the allegations described in the opposition brief would almost certainly survive a similar motion to dismiss. Thus, the claims against Wenger are dismissed with leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within 14 days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. City of Antioch

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 30, 2024
23-cv-01895-VC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Allen v. City of Antioch

Case Details

Full title:TRENT ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 30, 2024

Citations

23-cv-01895-VC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)