From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Bd. of Parole Post-Prison Supervision

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 21, 1993
862 P.2d 1317 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

CA A74396

Submitted on record and briefs September 29, 1993.

Affirmed November 3, 1993. Reconsideration denied December 8, 1993. Petition for review denied December 21, 1993 ( 318 Or. 246).

Judicial Review from Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for petitioner.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that set his parole release date. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board's reliance on information that it refused to disclose to him violated his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

In Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or. App. 331, 862 P.2d 1312 (1993), we decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position, holding that the Board may deny petitioner access to certain information.

Petitioner's other arguments do not require discussion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Allen v. Bd. of Parole Post-Prison Supervision

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 21, 1993
862 P.2d 1317 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Allen v. Bd. of Parole Post-Prison Supervision

Case Details

Full title:GERALD R. ALLEN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 21, 1993

Citations

862 P.2d 1317 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
862 P.2d 1317