From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. ABC Phones of N.C., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 29, 2024
5:23-cv-02367-SSS-SPx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-02367-SSS-SPx

01-29-2024

Dwayne Allen v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc., et al.


Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff's and Defendant's Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report

On December 27, 2023, the Court issued an order setting the Scheduling Conference for February 9, 2024 [Dkt. 16]. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report not later than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. As of today's date, the parties have not filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff, Michael J. Jaurigue; Osmundo Josue Arguello; and S. Sean Shahabi, and counsel for Defendant, Robert L. Shipley and Brandon S. Gray, to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Counsel are DIRECTED to respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday, February 5, 2024, at 12:00 noon. Counsel's failure to respond-or counsel's filing of an inadequate response-may result in the imposition of additional sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. ABC Phones of N.C., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 29, 2024
5:23-cv-02367-SSS-SPx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Allen v. ABC Phones of N.C., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Dwayne Allen v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 29, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-02367-SSS-SPx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2024)