From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen-Mensah v. O'Malley

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 2, 2007
215 F. App'x 86 (3d Cir. 2007)

Summary

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging that defendants experimented on plaintiff

Summary of this case from Chergi v. Georgia

Opinion

No. 06-3387.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 January 19, 2007.

Filed: February 2, 2007.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 06-cv-02362), District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III.

Carolyn R. Allen-Mensah, Chester, PA, pro se.

Virignia D. Powell, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for FBI Agent O'Malley, and Involved FBI Agents, et al.

BEFORE: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.


OPINION


In June 2006, pro se appellant Carolyn R. Allen-Mensah filed a complaint in the District Court alleging, inter alia, that FBI agents conducted "illegal guinea pig experiments on my sons and me" and "had psychotic pilots use electrical force on my sons to make them commit" crimes and "involuntary sex acts." Allen-Mensah seeks "immediate release and return of [her] son" and "removal of the electric weapons from [her] body." The District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Allen-Mensah timely appealed and appellee has filed a motion for summary action.

This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As there is no question that Allen-Mensah's claims involve fantastic factual scenarios and that the complaint lacks any arguable factual or legal basis, see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989), we will grant the appellee's motion to summarily affirm the District Court's dismissal of the complaint. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6.


Summaries of

Allen-Mensah v. O'Malley

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 2, 2007
215 F. App'x 86 (3d Cir. 2007)

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging that defendants experimented on plaintiff

Summary of this case from Chergi v. Georgia

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging defendants experimented on plaintiff stating that plaintiff's claims "involve fantastic factual scenarios . . . lack [ing] any arguable factual or legal basis"

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Trans Union LLC

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging defendants experimented on plaintiff

Summary of this case from Degrazia v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging that defendants experimented on plaintiff

Summary of this case from HIGGS v. C/O SUEY

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging defendants experimented on plaintiff

Summary of this case from James v. Walls

affirming judgment dismissing complaint alleging defendants experimented on plaintiff

Summary of this case from Trobovic v. Perry
Case details for

Allen-Mensah v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:Carolyn R. ALLEN-MENSAH, Appellant v. FBI Agent O'MALLEY, and Involved FBI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 2, 2007

Citations

215 F. App'x 86 (3d Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Trobovic v. Perry

Eisenstein v. Ebsworth, 148 Fed.Appx. 75, 77 (3d Cir. 2005) (affirming order dismissing complaint for, inter…

Johnson v. Trans Union LLC

Even under the liberal notice pleading requirements of Rule 8, and the liberal perspective in which pro se…