From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allee v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 27, 1973
42 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

September 27, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 12, 1972, insofar as appealed from, is unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the cross motion to dismiss the first cause of action granted and said cause of action dismissed. The cause of action for false arrest and imprisonment arose at the time of plaintiff's actual physical release from confinement, which occurred on June 4, 1970, when he was released on his own recognizance. ( Caminito v. City of New York, 25 A.D.2d 848, affd. 19 N.Y.2d 931; Schildhaus v. City of New York, 23 A.D.2d 409, affd. 17 N.Y.2d 853; Molyneaux v. County of Nassau, 22 A.D.2d 954, affd. 16 N.Y.2d 663.) Accordingly, the notice of claim filed on November 6, 1970 did not comply with the 90-day period prescribed by the statute (General Municipal Law, § 50-e), and the first cause of action for false arrest should be dismissed.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Nunez, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Allee v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 27, 1973
42 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Allee v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS D. ALLEE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, and JOHN DOWD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Adekalu v. New York City

Under New York law, an action for false arrest and imprisonment arises at the time of the plaintiff's actual,…

Troffo v. P.D. of New York

The time within which to file a notice of claim for false arrest/imprisonment begins to run from the date of…