Summary
concluding that Bivens was the appropriate vehicle for a petitioner's challenges to conditions of confinement, "even if [the p]etitioner had requested release from custody or some other appropriate habeas relief"
Summary of this case from Bolden v. PonceOpinion
Case No. CV 17-05201 AG (RAO)
08-31-2017
RATEEK ALLAH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.
JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the related Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability, this action is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner raising his claims in a civil rights action. DATED: August 31, 2017
/s/_________
ANDREW J. GUILFORD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE