Opinion
No. 570444/14.
12-01-2014
ALL PEOPLES HOMESTEAD OF 309 HDFC, Petitioner–Landlord–Respondent, v. Carl MILSAP, Respondent–Tenant–Appellant, and Enobia Milsap, “John Doe,” and “Jane Doe,” Respondents–Undertenants.
Opinion
Order (Jack Stoller, J.), dated February 20, 2013, affirmed, without costs.
To the extent that tenant's most recent postjudgment application can be read as seeking the removal of his guardian ad litem, the application was properly denied in the absence of just cause or any showing that the guardian did not fulfill her responsibilities (see Matter of Carol C., 41 AD3d 474 [2007] ). We note tenant's failure to timely appeal the underlying final judgment awarding landlord possession on its nuisance claim.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I CONCUR.