Opinion
21-cv-366 (MJD/LIB)
08-29-2022
Edward C. Olson, Disability Attorneys of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN and Karl E. Osterhout, Osterhout Disability Law, Oakmont, PA, Counsel for Plaintiff. Michael Moss, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Dallas, TX, Counsel for Defendant.
Edward C. Olson, Disability Attorneys of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN and Karl E. Osterhout, Osterhout Disability Law, Oakmont, PA, Counsel for Plaintiff.
Michael Moss, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Dallas, TX, Counsel for Defendant.
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 27, 2022. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Brisbois. The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 27, 2022. (Doc. 31.)
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 26) is DENIED.
3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29) is GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.