From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ali v. Hudson Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 18, 2016
No. 1:16-cv-00409-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2016)

Opinion

No. 1:16-cv-00409-DAD-EPG

08-18-2016

HUSSEIN ALI, Plaintiff, v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN SAFETY CASUALTY INSURANCE, AND PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE (Doc. Nos. 13, 27, 32, 103, 107)

On August 17, 2016, plaintiff Hussein Ali filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) as to defendants Hudson Insurance Company, American Safety Casualty Insurance, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance, and Western Surety Co. (Doc. No. 107.) Under Rule 41(a), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order if he or she files "a notice or dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment" or "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)-(ii). Here, defendants Hudson Insurance Company, American Safety Casualty Insurance, and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance have filed neither an answer nor a motion for summary judgment. However, they have all filed motions to dismiss. (See Doc. Nos. 26, 27 and 103.) "Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)." Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Miller v. Reddin, 422 F.2d 1264, 1265 (9th Cir. 1970)). Defendants Hudson Insurance Company, American Safety Casualty Insurance, and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance are therefore dismissed from this action without prejudice. Moreover, the voluntary dismissal renders the motions to dismiss filed on behalf of defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance moot. See id. ("Filing a notice of voluntary dismissal with the court automatically terminates the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.").

Defendant Western Surety Co. has already been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the court's June 1, 2016 order. (Doc. No. 89.) --------

Based upon the foregoing,

1) Defendants Hudson Insurance Company, American Safety Casualty Insurance, and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance have been dismissed without prejudice;

2) The clerk of court is directed to terminate defendants Hudson Insurance Company, American Safety Casualty Insurance, and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance from this action;

3) The clerk of the court is directed to terminate Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance's motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 27 and 103) as having been rendered moot; and

4) The clerk of the court is further directed to terminate motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 13 and 32) by Aegis Security Insurance Company and Western Surety Co., who have both already been dismissed from the action, as having been rendered moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18 , 2016

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ali v. Hudson Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 18, 2016
No. 1:16-cv-00409-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Ali v. Hudson Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HUSSEIN ALI, Plaintiff, v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 18, 2016

Citations

No. 1:16-cv-00409-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2016)