From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alford v. Carlton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P

03-05-2013

THOMAS T. ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN S. CARLTON, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a motion to compel discovery in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 25.) As a discovery and scheduling order has not issued and the discovery period has not begun, plaintiff's motion is premature and will be denied. Plaintiff is not precluded from filing another motion to compel at the appropriate time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff's February 27, 2013 motion to compel discovery (Dkt. No. 25) is denied as premature.

___________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Alford v. Carlton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Alford v. Carlton

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS T. ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN S. CARLTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)