From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alford v. Carlton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P

02-19-2013

THOMAS T. ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN S. CARLTON, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 23) is denied.

_____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Alford v. Carlton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Alford v. Carlton

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS T. ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN S. CARLTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1470 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)