From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Wichita Housing Authority

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Aug 9, 2007
Case No. 07-1149-JTM (D. Kan. Aug. 9, 2007)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's net income outpaced his monthly expenses by more than $700

Summary of this case from Brown v. Titan Prot. & Consulting

Opinion

Case No. 07-1149-JTM.

August 9, 2007


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


On June 19, 2007, the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation with respect to the present proceeding. The Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that if plaintiff tendered the filing fee in order to continue the case, plaintiff was to supplement his complaint by July 9, 2007. On July 17, 2007, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to July 30, 2007, to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and to supplement his complaint.

No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and no supplement to the complaint has been filed. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the report, and finds that this action should be dismissed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2007, that this action should be and is hereby dismissed without prejudice and costs are assessed against the plaintiff.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Wichita Housing Authority

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Aug 9, 2007
Case No. 07-1149-JTM (D. Kan. Aug. 9, 2007)

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's net income outpaced his monthly expenses by more than $700

Summary of this case from Brown v. Titan Prot. & Consulting

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's monthly income exceeded his monthly expenses by more than $700

Summary of this case from James v. U.S. Coast Guard

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's net income exceeded his monthly expenses by more than $700

Summary of this case from Zheng v. Duke

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's net income exceeded his monthly expenses by more than $700.00

Summary of this case from Neighbors v. Smith

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's net income exceeded his monthly expenses by more than $700.00

Summary of this case from Baizhigitov v. Finnair

adopting report and recommendation that motion be denied where plaintiff's net income exceeded his monthly expenses by more than $700.00

Summary of this case from Mays v. Kan. City

explaining that § 1915 applies to every case filed in forma pauperis

Summary of this case from Robles v. Amarr Garage Doors
Case details for

Alexander v. Wichita Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL J. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. WICHITA HOUSING AUTHORITY, CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Aug 9, 2007

Citations

Case No. 07-1149-JTM (D. Kan. Aug. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Zheng v. Duke

Id. at 1313. See, e.g., Alexander v. Wichita Hous. Auth., No. 07-1149-JTM, 2007 WL 2316902, at *1 (D. Kan.…

Young v. Howard

Id. (quoting White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1233 (10th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1008 (1999)).…