From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 30, 2015
174 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D15–2513.

09-30-2015

Emmitt Antoine ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Nikkita Benise Houston, Appellees.

Emmitt Antoine Alexander, pro se Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.


Emmitt Antoine Alexander, pro se Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as a transcript of the administrative proceeding that resulted in the order on appeal cannot be produced due to a malfunction in the recording equipment, we REVERSE and REMAND for a hearing de novo. See N. Dade Sec. Ltd. v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 530 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 30, 2015
174 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Alexander v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Emmitt Antoine ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

174 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)