From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Connell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 28, 2010
05 Civ. 9020 (WHP) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2010)

Opinion

05 Civ. 9020 (WHP) (HBP).

May 28, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner pro se Victor Alexander ("Alexander") petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction in New York State court. This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. On April 9, 2010, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a report and recommendation (the "Report") recommending that Alexander's petition be denied. The time to file objections or request an extension of time has passed, and neither party submitted an objection or requested additional time.

This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Pitman's thorough and well-reasoned Report and finds that it is not facially erroneous.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report in its entirety and denies Alexander's petition. Because Alexander has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addition, this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and mark this case as closed.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Alexander v. Connell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 28, 2010
05 Civ. 9020 (WHP) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2010)
Case details for

Alexander v. Connell

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT SUSAN CONNELL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 28, 2010

Citations

05 Civ. 9020 (WHP) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2010)

Citing Cases

Garner v. Lee

nd that Petitioner's ineffective assistance claim is procedurally barred for purposes of federal habeas…