From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Cassidy

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 21, 2012
491 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 143812.COA No. 301860.

2012-03-21

Royal ALEXANDER, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Brett CASSIDY, Robert Frost, and Blake Hiben, Defendants–Appellants,andNate Guiger, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for plenary consideration. The court shall address the defendants' claims of immunity under both state and federal law, employing the standards appropriate to those claims.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Cassidy

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 21, 2012
491 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

Alexander v. Cassidy

Case Details

Full title:Royal ALEXANDER, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Brett CASSIDY, Robert Frost, and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 21, 2012

Citations

491 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2012)
809 N.W.2d 562

Citing Cases

Alexander v. Cassidy

Because we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact on the officers' qualified immunity claims…