From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-0651 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0651 WBS CKD P

01-09-2013

ALEXIOS ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. RON BARNES, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 66) is denied.

______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Alexander v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-0651 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Alexander v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:ALEXIOS ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. RON BARNES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0651 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013)