From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Anheuser-Busch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 6, 2019
CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00738 (W.D. La. Nov. 6, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00738

11-06-2019

BRUCE ALEXANDER v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, et al.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Rule 12(b)(2) motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., Carlos Brito, and Joao Mauricio Giffoni de Castro Neves [doc. # 9] and Anheuser-Busch, LLC [doc. # 16] are GRANTED, and that plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Monroe, Louisiana, this 6th day of November, 2019.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Alexander v. Anheuser-Busch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 6, 2019
CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00738 (W.D. La. Nov. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Alexander v. Anheuser-Busch

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE ALEXANDER v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 6, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00738 (W.D. La. Nov. 6, 2019)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Tanner

at *1 (N.D. Tex. July 30, 2007) (finding claims that the ACLU was “seeking to impose minority rule through…