From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aleksanian v. Uber Techs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 8, 2021
19 CIVIL 10308 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 10308 (ALC)

03-08-2021

LEVON ALEKSANIAN, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representative, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., ET AL., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order & Opinion dated March 8, 2021, Plaintiffs' motion for discovery is DENIED and Defendants' motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED. The case is hereby DISMISSED. See Benzemann v. Citibank, N.A., 622 F. App'x 16, 18 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (concluding that outright dismissal, as opposed to stay, is appropriate where none of the parties had requested a stay), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 618 (2017); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 8, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Aleksanian v. Uber Techs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 8, 2021
19 CIVIL 10308 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Aleksanian v. Uber Techs.

Case Details

Full title:LEVON ALEKSANIAN, individually, on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 8, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 10308 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2021)