From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alejandro-Najarro v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 13, 2020
NO. 03-19-00124-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 03-19-00124-CR

02-13-2020

Jose Alberto Alejandro-Najarro, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
NO. CR-16-0499 , THE HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant's counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant's pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before February 24, 2020. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on February 13, 2020. Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Alejandro-Najarro v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 13, 2020
NO. 03-19-00124-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Alejandro-Najarro v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jose Alberto Alejandro-Najarro, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Feb 13, 2020

Citations

NO. 03-19-00124-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2020)