From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.L.E.H. v.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 18, 2017
524 S.W.3d 172 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. WD 80386 (Consolidated with WD 80388).

07-18-2017

IN the INTEREST OF: A.L.E.H.; K.L.K., Respondent, v. K.D.H. (Mother), Appellant, P.J.H. (Father), Appellant.

Sarah Johnston, Katherine Jean Rodgers, Kansas City, for Respondents. Jill Marie Katz, Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, for Appellants.


Sarah Johnston, Katherine Jean Rodgers, Kansas City, for Respondents.

Jill Marie Katz, Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, for Appellants.

Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

K.D.H. and P.J.H. appeal the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court terminating their parental rights over A.L.E.H. and approving the adoption of A.L.E.H. by K.L.K. They present nine points on appeal. Seven of those points claim the circuit court erred in terminating their parental rights pursuant to each statutory ground cited by the court. An eighth point claims that the mother's consent was required pursuant to Chapter 453. A ninth point claims the circuit court erred in denying deposition costs. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

A.L.E.H. v.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 18, 2017
524 S.W.3d 172 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

A.L.E.H. v.

Case Details

Full title:IN the INTEREST OF: A.L.E.H.; K.L.K., Respondent, v. K.D.H. (Mother)…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 18, 2017

Citations

524 S.W.3d 172 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)