In Alderson, the two policies had the same named insured and insurer and a household exclusion clause identical to that in Defendant's policy.
Summary of this case from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RothNo. 520 WAL (2005).
September 18, 2006.
Appeal from the Superior Court Pa.Super., 884 A.2d 288.
Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeals Denied.
In Alderson, the two policies had the same named insured and insurer and a household exclusion clause identical to that in Defendant's policy.
Summary of this case from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RothFull title:Alderson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Sep 18, 2006
Since the Craley decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in a…