From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albritton v. Sauers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 22, 2011
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-869 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-869.

September 22, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2011, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Blewitt (Doc. 23), to which no objections have been filed, it is ORDERED that said Report (Doc. 23) is accepted.

Pursuant to Judge Blewitt's Recommendation, it is further ORDERED, (1) that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is DENIED and, (2) that Petitioner's motions for evidentiary hearings (Docs. 17 and 22) are DENIED as premature and moot, respectively.

This case is remanded to Judge Blewitt for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Albritton v. Sauers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 22, 2011
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-869 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Albritton v. Sauers

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE ALBRITTON, Petitioner v. DEBRA K. SAUERS, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-869 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2011)

Citing Cases

McMillian v. Eason

Williams v. Tennis, No. 06-93, 2007 WL 294092, at *1 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 29, 2007). See, e.g., Apostolec v.…