From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert v. Mont. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Apr 16, 2019
CV 17-69-H-BMM (D. Mont. Apr. 16, 2019)

Opinion

CV 17-69-H-BMM

04-16-2019

MICHAEL ALBERT, Plaintiff, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REGINALD D. MICHAEL, MISSOULA COUNTY, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PARTNERS, PAUL REES, HEIDI ABBOTT, MELISSA SCHARF, ALLY CARL, TRISTAN KOHUT, CONNIE WINNER, KIMBERLY FISK, JORDEN MCDONALD, ALVIN FODE, JIM SALMONSEN, STEVEN WEBER, MIKE HERBERT, PATRICK MARTIN, STEVE KREMER, RUSS DANAHER, LEROY KIRKEGARD, ABBY MARTIN, and LESLIE THORNTON, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and Recommendations in this case on March 14, 2019. (Doc. 56.) Judge Johnston recommended Defendant Missoula County's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 36) should be granted in part and denied part. (Doc. 56 at 22-23.) Judge Johnston recommended that State Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 50) likewise should be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 56 at 23-24.)

Neither party filed objections. The Court reviews findings and recommendations not objected to for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 56) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. Missoula County's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 36) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

a. Albert's § 1983 Monell claims against Missoula County, ADA claim, Rehabilitation Act claim, negligence per se claim, and Montana Constitutional claim of right to individual dignity as alleged in Counts I, II, IV, V, VII, and IX is DISMISSED WIHTOUT PREJUDICE.

b. Albert's medical malpractice claim against Missoula County as alleged in Count X is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 50) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

a. Defendants Reginald D. Michael and Leroy Kirkegard are DISMISSED from Albert's § 1983 claims alleged in Counts I, II, and III.
b. Defendant Jim Salmonsen is DISMISSED from Albert's § 1983 claims alleged in Counts II and III.

c. Defendants Montana Department of Corrections, Michael, employees or agents of MSP and the Montana Department of Corrections, and Wardens Salmonsen and Kirkegard are DISMISSED from Counts IV and V. The State of Montana is SUBSTITUTED as the sole defendant in Counts IV and V.

d. All individual named State Defendants are DISMISEED WITH PREJUDICE from state law claims in Counts VI through X. The State of Montana is SUBSTITUED in their place.

e. Albert's Montana State Constitutional right to individual dignity claim in Count IX is DISMISSED.

f. Count XI is DISMISED as a separate count. Albert is allowed to seek punitive damages as a form of relief.
DATED this 16th day of April, 2019.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Albert v. Mont. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Apr 16, 2019
CV 17-69-H-BMM (D. Mont. Apr. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Albert v. Mont. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ALBERT, Plaintiff, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REGINALD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2019

Citations

CV 17-69-H-BMM (D. Mont. Apr. 16, 2019)