From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert v. Abbot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Nov 28, 2017
CV-17-69-H-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Nov. 28, 2017)

Opinion

CV-17-69-H-BMM-JTJ

11-28-2017

MICHAEL ALBERT, Plaintiff, v. HEIDI ABBOT, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff Michael Albert ("Albert") filed a complaint on June 12, 2017, alleging six civil rights and sexual harassment claims arising under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. (Doc. 2.)

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston issued an Order and Findings and Recommendations in this matter on November 6, 2017. (Doc. 10.) Judge Johnston found that Albert has a "reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits" of claims I, II, III, IV, and VI, and ordered Defendants to respond. (Doc. 9 at 1.) Judge Johnston further recommended that the Court dismiss Albert's fifth claim, which alleges sexual harassment. (Doc. 9 at 5.)

No party filed objections to Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations. The Court has thus reviewed the Findings and Recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in full.

I. DISCUSSION

Judge Johnston recommends that the Court dismiss Albert's sexual harassment claim because Albert fails to state a claim for relief. (Doc. 9 at 3.) Albert alleges that Defendant Smidt, a female corrections officer, "asked if [he] wanted a prison wife." (Doc. 2 at 22.)

As Judge Johnston notes, verbal harassment alone is insufficient to rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation. Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171-72 (9th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted). Therefore, Albert has failed to state a cognizable claim for relief with regard to Count V.

II. ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

Count V of the Complaint raising allegations of sexual harassment is DISMISSED. Defendants Smidt, Wood, Noll, Pentland, and Cobban are DISMISSED.

DATED this 28th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Albert v. Abbot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Nov 28, 2017
CV-17-69-H-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Nov. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Albert v. Abbot

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ALBERT, Plaintiff, v. HEIDI ABBOT, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2017

Citations

CV-17-69-H-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Nov. 28, 2017)