From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alamiin v. Beasley

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jul 6, 2011
Case No. CIV-06-0871-F (W.D. Okla. Jul. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-06-0871-F.

July 6, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing through counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA).

The June 13, 2011 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo (doc. no. 160) recommends that the motion for summary judgment of the sole remaining defendant, Cornell Companies, Inc., be granted. (Doc. no. 153.) The Report advised that any objection to the Report must be filed by July 5, 2011, and that failure to make timely objection to the Report waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues addressed in the Report. No objection to the Report has been filed, and no request for an extension of time within to file such an objection has been sought.

Having conducted its own review, and with there being no objection, the court finds that it agrees with the Report. It further finds that no purpose would be served by stating any further analysis here.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Argo is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED in its entirety. The motion for summary judgment of Cornell Companies, Inc. is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Alamiin v. Beasley

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jul 6, 2011
Case No. CIV-06-0871-F (W.D. Okla. Jul. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Alamiin v. Beasley

Case Details

Full title:WAHIID M. ALAMIIN, a/k/a JAMES SHOCKEY, Plaintiff, v. JEWEL BEASLEY, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. CIV-06-0871-F (W.D. Okla. Jul. 6, 2011)

Citing Cases

Kimbrough v. Bd. of Trs. for The Okla. Cnty. Criminal Justice Auth.

When evaluating such a claim, “rigorous standards of culpability and causation must be applied to ensure that…