From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alamiin v. Beasley

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Dec 9, 2010
Case No. CIV-06-0871-F (W.D. Okla. Dec. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-06-0871-F.

December 9, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing through counsel, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of his constitutional rights.

Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo has issued a Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 134), recommending that the joint motion for summary judgment of defendants Beasley and Dishman (doc. no. 129) be denied as moot following the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with respect to the claims against those defendants.

The Report advised the parties of their right to file an objection by December 6, 2010, and further advised that failure to make timely objection waives their right to appellate review of factual and legal questions addressed in the report. No objection has been filed, and no extension of time within which to object has been sought.

Having conducted its own review, and with there being no objection, the court finds that it agrees with the report. It further finds that no purpose would be served by any further analysis here.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Argo is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED in its entirety. The motion for summary judgment of defendants Beasley and Dishman is DENIED as MOOT.

This order does not dispose of all issues referred to the Magistrate Judge. This action remains referred.

Dated this 9th day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Alamiin v. Beasley

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Dec 9, 2010
Case No. CIV-06-0871-F (W.D. Okla. Dec. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Alamiin v. Beasley

Case Details

Full title:WAHIID M. ALAMIIN, a/k/a JAMES SHOCKEY, Plaintiff, v. JEWEL BEASLEY, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-06-0871-F (W.D. Okla. Dec. 9, 2010)