From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Causey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 14, 1938
180 So. 590 (Ala. 1938)

Opinion

7 Div. 507.

April 14, 1938.

W. T. Starnes, of Pell City, and Knox, Acker, Sterne Liles, of Anniston, for petitioner.

Frank B. Embry, of Pell City, opposed.


The petitioner seeks to review the Court of Appeals on that court's conclusion of fact, and the evidence on which such conclusion is rested is not set out in extenso in the court's opinion. This necessitates a denial of the writ. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ of certiorari denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS, BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Causey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 14, 1938
180 So. 590 (Ala. 1938)
Case details for

Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Causey

Case Details

Full title:ALABAMA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. v. CAUSEY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 14, 1938

Citations

180 So. 590 (Ala. 1938)
180 So. 590

Citing Cases

Opelika Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Johnson

Gardner v. Sumner, 40 Ala. App. 340, 113 So.2d 523; Reichert Milling Co. v. George, 230 Ala. 3, 162 So. 393.…

Freeman v. State

It seems to be a uniform rule that where the evidence upon which the Court of Appeals based its conclusion is…