From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Al Fang Wu v. Prem-Mortg., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 29, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01306-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-01306-RCJ-PAL

01-29-2013

AL FANG WU, Plaintiff, v. PREM-MORTGAGE, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER


(Mot Leave Respond - Dkt. #8)

Before the court is Defendants' Motion for Leave to (1) Respond to Complaint and (2) Respond to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #8) filed November 28, 2012, which has been referred to the undersigned by the district judge for a ruling. Plaintiff did not file a response and the time for filing a response has now run.

LR 7-2(d) states that the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. As no opposition has been filed, the court will grant the motion. A proposed answer is attached to Defendants' motion, and on January 28, 2013 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt #12). The same day the district judge issued the court's standard order informing the Plaintiff of the requirements for responding to the motion.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Leave to (1) Respond to Complaint and (2) Respond to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have ten days from the date of this order in which to file their responses.

____________________

Peggy A. Leen

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Al Fang Wu v. Prem-Mortg., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 29, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01306-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Al Fang Wu v. Prem-Mortg., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AL FANG WU, Plaintiff, v. PREM-MORTGAGE, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-01306-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 29, 2013)