From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akron, Canton Youngstown R.R. v. Frozen Food Express

U.S.
Oct 14, 1957
355 U.S. 6 (1957)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

No. 258.

Decided October 14, 1957.

Together with No. 263, American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Frozen Food Express, and No. 270, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeals from the same court.

148 F. Supp. 399, affirmed.

Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258.

Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263.

Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270.

Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.



The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


Summaries of

Akron, Canton Youngstown R.R. v. Frozen Food Express

U.S.
Oct 14, 1957
355 U.S. 6 (1957)
Case details for

Akron, Canton Youngstown R.R. v. Frozen Food Express

Case Details

Full title:AKRON, CANTON YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v . FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 14, 1957

Citations

355 U.S. 6 (1957)

Citing Cases

Serv. First Logistics, Inc. v. J. Rodriguez Trucking, Inc.

(6) Vegetables - Washed, fresh, in cellophane bags - Exempt - Law (page 28). Defendant argues that courts…

Milk Transport, Inc. v. Inc. v. I.C.C.

under the "grandfather" clause is that the commodity must have been "exempt" prior to the 1958 Act and was…