From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akron, C. Y. Ry. Co. v. P.U.C

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 12, 1929
172 N.E. 380 (Ohio 1929)

Opinion

No. 21759

Decided June 12, 1929.

Public Utilities Commission — Freight rates — Amesite or crushed store asphaltum coated.

ERROR to the Public Utilities Commission.

Mr. W.B. Pierce, Mr. W.T. Pierson and Messrs. Wilson Rector, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, Mr. T.J. Herbert, Mr. Beecher W. Waltermire, Mr. James A. White and Mr. R.A. Eldridge, for defendants in error.


This court finding that the order of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio is supported by the record, it is ordered and adjudged that the order of the said Public Utilities Commission of Ohio be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

Order affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., KINKADE, ROBINSON, MATTHIAS and ALLEN, JJ., concur. JONES, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Akron, C. Y. Ry. Co. v. P.U.C

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 12, 1929
172 N.E. 380 (Ohio 1929)
Case details for

Akron, C. Y. Ry. Co. v. P.U.C

Case Details

Full title:THE AKRON, CANTON YOUNGSTOWN Ry. CO. ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 12, 1929

Citations

172 N.E. 380 (Ohio 1929)
172 N.E. 380

Citing Cases

Penna. Rd. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm

But if this court finds, from a consideration of the evidence, that the commission has acted unreasonably or…

Baltimore Ohio Rd. Co. v. P.U.C.

However, upon an examination of several other sections of the Code, notably Sections 501, 614-2 and 614-42,…