From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 21, 2004
153 S.W.3d 868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 84025.

December 21, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Donald L. McCullin, Judge.

Maleaner R. Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Daniels, Karen Kramer (co-counsel), Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.


ORDER


Norman Akins appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He alleged he his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the charges against him before advising him to plead guilty.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Akins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 21, 2004
153 S.W.3d 868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Akins v. State

Case Details

Full title:Norman AKINS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 21, 2004

Citations

153 S.W.3d 868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)