From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akins v. Kroger Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Oct 1, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00134-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00134-P-BP

10-01-2019

HENRY AKINS II, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 27) and Plaintiff's Objections thereto (ECF No. 28).

The Court has liberally construed Plaintiff's objections in light of Plaintiff's pro se status. Following a de novo review, the Court OVERRULES the Objections, as none of the Objections alter the Magistrate Judge's finding and conclusion that Plaintiff failed to properly serve the named defendant under Rule 4(c)(1). FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(1).

After conducting a de novo review of all relevant matters of record in this case and the applicable law, the Court determines that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are ACCEPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, this matter is WITHDRAWN from United States Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED on this 1st day of October, 2019.

/s/_________

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Akins v. Kroger Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Oct 1, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00134-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Akins v. Kroger Co.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY AKINS II, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00134-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2019)