From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akin v. Bonfils

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 7, 1915
153 P. 678 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 6250

Opinion Filed December 7, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Dudley, C.)

Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, Judge.

Action by F.G. Bonfils and others against Lee A. Akin. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

W.O. Woolman, for plaintiff in error.

C.F. Dyer and Foose Brown, for defendants in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case were filed in this court on April 8, 1914. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Akin v. Bonfils

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 7, 1915
153 P. 678 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Akin v. Bonfils

Case Details

Full title:AKIN v. BONFILS et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 7, 1915

Citations

153 P. 678 (Okla. 1915)
153 P. 678