Opinion
Argued December 18, 1892
Decided March 1, 1892
Payson Merrill for appellant.
Franklin Bartlett for respondent.
MAYNARD, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except EARL, Ch. J., FINCH and GRAY, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Akersloot v. Second Avenue Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1892
30 N.E. 195 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Akersloot v. Second Avenue Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1892
30 N.E. 195 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Akersloot v. Second Avenue Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:HENRY S. AKERSLOOT, Respondent, v . THE SECOND AVENUE RAILROAD COMPANY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 1, 1892
Citations
30 N.E. 195 (N.Y. 1892)
30 N.E. 195
Citing Cases
Morrow v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Co.
" I think that the rule is stated by CULLEN, J., in Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co. ( 32 App. Div.…
Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.I think the case of Black v. Third Avenue R.R. Co. ( 2 App. Div. 387) cannot be fairly construed as holding…