From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akers v. Rivas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Dec 15, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-1339-MJR (S.D. Ill. Dec. 15, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-1339-MJR

12-15-2016

MONTGOMERY C. AKERS, Plaintiff, v. HENRY RIVAS, KATHERIN GIEREVELA, and APRYL CRUT, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REAGAN, Chief District Judge :

Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois ("Marion"), located in this District. He submitted a pro se civil rights Complaint to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, complaining of actions taken by individuals residing in Marion, Illinois, Terra Haute, Indiana, and Martinsburg, West Virginia. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada transferred Plaintiff's case to this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk of Court filed the Complaint upon receiving it, though Plaintiff has been banned from filing any new cases in this District in accordance with the Seventh Circuit's May 17, 2012 Order in Akers v. Roal, et al., Case No. 11-3268 (citing Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 433 (7th Cir. 1997)). Prior to the imposition of this filing restriction, he had accumulated more than three "strikes" as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), but continued to file additional cases.

On August 13, 2012, in Akers v. Roal, et al., Case No. 11-cv-622-MJR (S.D. Ill.) (Doc. 38), this Court placed a filing restriction on Plaintiff until he pays the outstanding filing fees of $805.00 that he incurred in two prior actions. See Akers, Case No. 11-cv-622-MJR ($350.00); Akers, Case No. 11-3268 ($455.00). Plaintiff was instructed that the Clerk of Court would return unfiled any documents submitted in violation of the filing restriction. Since the entry of that order, Plaintiff has made no payments toward his outstanding fees of $805.00. By the terms of that Order, he must pay his outstanding fees in full prior to filing documents with this Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is STRICKEN, because Plaintiff submitted it in violation of this Court's Order of August 13, 2012.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to return the Complaint to Plaintiff and administratively close this case. Any pending motions are TERMINATED AS MOOT.

Plaintiff shall not be assessed a filing fee for this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 15, 2016

s/ MICHAEL J. REAGAN

Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan

United States District Court


Summaries of

Akers v. Rivas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Dec 15, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-1339-MJR (S.D. Ill. Dec. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Akers v. Rivas

Case Details

Full title:MONTGOMERY C. AKERS, Plaintiff, v. HENRY RIVAS, KATHERIN GIEREVELA, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Dec 15, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-1339-MJR (S.D. Ill. Dec. 15, 2016)

Citing Cases

Akers v. United States

Following imposition of the restriction, Akers continued filing cases in different federal district courts.…

Akers v. United States

Following imposition of the restriction, Akers continued filing cases in different federal district courts.…