From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akers v. City of Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 8, 1999
745 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-380.

Opinion filed December 8, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, David L. Tobin, Judge, L.T. No. 97-49927.

Ginsberg Schwartz and Arnold Ginsberg and Samuel M. Spatzer, for appellants.

Angones Hunter McClure Lynch Williams and Christopher J. Lynch, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, and FLETCHER, JJ.


As appellee properly concedes, the trial court erred in ruling that the City of Miami Beach was entitled to summary judgment based on the immunity provided by section 440.11, Florida Statutes (1995). Ramos v. Univision Holdings, Inc., 655 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1995). Appellee would have us affirm the summary judgment nevertheless on the alternative ground that there is insufficient evidence to support a finding of negligence on the part of the City. Because the trial court based its judgment solely on the workers' compensation immunity and this court should not ordinarily decide issues not ruled on by the trial court in the first instance, we reverse the summary judgment and express no opinion as to the legal merits of appellee's alternative ground at this time. McGurn v. Scott, 596 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 1992); Sierra v. Public Health Trust of Dade County, 661 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Akers v. City of Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 8, 1999
745 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Akers v. City of Miami Beach

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY AKERS and CHRISTINE AKERS, his wife, Appellants, vs. CITY OF MIAMI…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 8, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Wells v. Wells

And in its order, the trial court did not make an explicit ruling on the issues of breach or…

Tucker v. Ebadian

onclusion and the rendition of the final order under review, and we decline, as we must, to decide in the…