From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akers v. Chen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 5, 2023
22-cv-05555 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-05555 BLF (PR)

09-05-2023

MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, Plaintiff, v. E. CHEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a convicted and sentenced federal prisoner currently confined at the USP Marion in Illinois, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a state court judge and under Bivens against a district court judge and several federal employees. Dkt. No. 1. On August 10, 2023, the Court revoked Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff had three or more prior dismissals and was not under imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of the filing of the action. Dkt. No. 24. Plaintiff was directed to pay the full filing fee ($402) within fourteen days from the date of the order or face dismissal. Id. at 3. The deadline of August 24, 2023, has passed, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED for failure to pay the filing fee.

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Akers v. Chen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 5, 2023
22-cv-05555 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Akers v. Chen

Case Details

Full title:MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, Plaintiff, v. E. CHEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 5, 2023

Citations

22-cv-05555 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2023)