Opinion
No. 20150229.
03-03-2016
Paul W. AKER, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Diane C. NEIBER, f.k.a. Diane C. Aker, Defendant and Appellee.
Amy M. Clark, Wahpeton, N.D., and John M. Wilka, Sioux Falls, S.D ., for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief. Samuel S. Johnson, Wahpeton, N.D., for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.
Amy M. Clark, Wahpeton, N.D., and John M. Wilka, Sioux Falls, S.D ., for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Samuel S. Johnson, Wahpeton, N.D., for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Paul Aker appeals a district court order denying his motion to amend parenting time. Aker claims the ongoing conflict between the parties constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting modification, and amending parenting time is in the best interests of the children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in finding no material change of circumstances warranting modification of parenting time.
[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, and DANIEL J. CROTHERS, JJ., concur.