From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.J. v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 11, 2021
21 Civ. 4482 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 11, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 4482 (AT)

06-11-2021

A. J., Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; ABC NYC agency now known as ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN SERVICES; ACS LOCATION f/k/a "CAMILLA'S HOUSE", JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge

To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of eveiy action and proceeding," Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions hi this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear- and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discoveiy through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

A.J. v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 11, 2021
21 Civ. 4482 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 11, 2021)
Case details for

A.J. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:A. J., Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; ABC NYC agency now known as…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 11, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 4482 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 11, 2021)