From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1959
9 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

December 1, 1959


Order and judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to the appellants, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. The action is to recover on an account receivable allegedly assigned to the plaintiff. The invoice representing the indebtedness contains a notation in the body thereof typed in the same manner as all of the rest of the matter contained therein, which reads "please make payment of this invoice to:" followed by the name and address of the plaintiff and concluding with the words "thank you." We must hold that there are issues of fact requiring a trial. Included in such issues is the question whether the notation referred to was sufficient to put the defendants on notice that the account was assigned. This, without reference to any others, raises triable issues.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, M.M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1959
9 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:A.J. ARMSTRONG CO., INC., Respondent, v. KASCO MILLS, INC. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1959

Citations

9 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Whitehall Mercantile v. Wellbilt Corp.

The court said in Continental Purchasing Co. v. Van Raalte Co. ( 251 App. Div. 151, 152): "After notice of…

Universal C.I.T. Corp. v. Greyhound, Inc.

The invoices, which defendant received at the same time that it received the cars, all bore the notation…