From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AIU Insurance v. ELRAC, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 2000

February 17, 2000

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendants Donna M. Cady and Daniel Neal in an action entitled Oquendo v. Neal pending in the Supreme Court, Ulster County, under Index No. 98/817, the defendant ELRAC, Inc., d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated February 18, 1999, which, sua sponte, transferred and consolidated this action with Oquendo v. Neal and referred the respective motions of the plaintiff and the defendant ELRAC, Inc., d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, for summary judgment to the Supreme Court, Ulster County, for determination.

Law Offices of Christopher A. Jeffreys, P.C., Melville, N Y (Glenn H. Egor of counsel), for appellant.

Stuart M. Herz, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, all of the papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see, CPLR 511 N.Y.CPLR[d]), and the respective motions of the plaintiff and the defendant ELRAC, Inc., for summary judgment are remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for determination.

The plaintiff and the defendant ELRAC, Inc., d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, moved and cross-moved, respectively, for summary judgment. The Supreme Court did not decide the motions, but rather, sua sponte, ordered that this action be transferred and consolidated with the underlying wrongful death action pending in the Supreme Court, Ulster County. The Supreme Court erred when it ordered consolidation in the absence of any motion by one of the parties for such relief (see, CPLR 602 N.Y.CPLR[b]; Singer v. Singer, 33 A.D.2d 1054; see also, New York Annual Conference of Methodist Church v. Nam Un Cho, 156 A.D.2d 511, 514; Kobak v. Schultz, 117 A.D.2d 714).


Summaries of

AIU Insurance v. ELRAC, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

AIU Insurance v. ELRAC, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent, v. ELRAC, INC., D/B/A ENTERPRISE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 900

Citing Cases

Rostkowski v. Baginski

The petitioner's contention that the Family Court acted improperly by consolidating his petition with a…

Ross v. Queens Org., LLC

Thus, the plaintiffs have demonstrated all the elements necessary for the issuance of a preliminary…