Opinion
22-cv-11144
06-21-2023
Lauren Aitken, Plaintiff, v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Defendant.
David R. Grand, Mag. Judge
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [15], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12], AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [14]
JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge
This is a Social Security appeal. On May 30, 2023, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 15) recommending the Court deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12) and grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14). The parties were required to file specific written objections to the report and recommendation within 14 days of service. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the report and recommendation, and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The report and recommendation (ECF No. 15) is ADOPTED;
The Court finds the R&R to be exceptionally thorough and well-reasoned, and it agrees entirely with the R&R's conclusion. However, there is one small (but potentially confusing) typographical error on PageID.995 of the R&R. Based on the Court's review of the transcript, the last sentence of the first paragraph on that page should read: “Thus, the ALJ concluded that Plaintiff was not disabled under the Act. (PageID.54).” (Id. at PageID.995 (emphasis added).) The R&R is adopted in full with this minor correction.
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12) is DENIED;
Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED; and
The findings of the Commissioner are ADOPTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.
By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005).
IT IS SO ORDERED.