Opinion
No. 32188
Decided May 24, 1950.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Contempt proceeding for violation of temporary restraining order against mass picketing — Motion to quash proceeding on ground order invalid — Motion for bill of particulars — Overruling of both motions — Finding of guilty — Due process.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.
Messrs. Marshman, Hollington Steadman, for appellee.
Messrs. Davis, Davis Handelman, for appellants.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.